Argall v. Seymour

McCrary', J.,

{orally.') These cases are before me, having been submitted upon tbe answer of the garnishee and other testimony taken upon the issue joined thereon, by stipulation of counsel jury being waived. The proceeding is against one Toy, as garnishee; and the claim of the plaintiffs in the several cases — I believe there are a number of them, all to be determined by the ruling upon these two — is that Toy, as garnishee, is responsible to certain judgment creditors of A. W. Seymour for the value of the stock of goods which Mr. Toy took under a chattel mortgage, and caused to be sold,…