Black v. Lord
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
OPINION OF
2Concurring in part, dissenting in partPerry, C. J.
I concur in the following conclusions: that the contract of August 19, 1919, as expressed in the letter of that date from respondent Lord to the complainant (exhibit K) was separate and distinct from the contract relating to the Alapai Street and Iwilei jobs and is not to be regarded as a renewal or extension of the earlier agreement; that the net profits referred to in the contract of August 19, 1919, a percentage of which is thereby secured to the complainant, are the net profits of the business as a whole during the period specified in that contract and are not the net profits of…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Barnes v. CollinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
- Strohm v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1896