Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Grodsky

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 22, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otto C. Jaeger, S.

In this contested accounting proceeding the executors move to vacate the objeetants’ demand for a trial by jury of those objections which relate to alleged omissions from the account of assets belonging to the estate, asserted to be in the possession of one of the coexecutors.

Whether the objeetants are entitled to a trial by jury turns upon whether their claims are based upon causes actionable at law (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 2; CPLR 4101; Surrogate’s Ct. Act, §§ 67, 68, 69; Matter of Boyle, 242 N. Y. 342; Matter of Garfield, 14 N Y 2d 251; Matter of Johnson, 46 Misc 2d 285),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of BoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. In re Van BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. In re NutrizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. In re the Estate of BeareNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  5. In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Renzi v. AleszczykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. In re the Estate of FilipiakNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
  3. In re the Estate of SchneierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API