Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1928No. 15Published

1DissentJustice Sutherland

In collision cases between private parties, interest, as a general rule, is allowed upon the amount of the loss sustained. That the allowance may be to'somejextent in the discretion of the court does not affect the question presented here, since the court below denied interest not as *50a matter of discretion but upon the ground that it had no power to allow- it against the United States. Erom an examination of the record, it" fairly may be assumed that if the case had been one between private parties interest would have been allowed..

It is said that when interest is allowed it is no part the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API