Legal Opinion

Blake v. Lee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Eclson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

In this action, after a trial before a jury, and verdict for plaintiff, a ease was settled by the judge. It appears from it that written instruments offered by plaintiff, and objected to by defendants, were received in evidence, and that written instruments offered by the defendants were, on the plaintiff’s objection, excluded. None of these are incorporated in or attached to the settled case. In lieu of that, however, the appellants have procured the clerk to forward here, as part of his return, copies of instruments, with his certificate that they are copies of the instruments so offered…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hospes v. Northwestern Manufacturing & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Arneson v. SpawnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sheffield King Milling Co. v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API