Boudreau v. Damas Food Market Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPatrick J. Picariello, J.
This is an oral application made by plaintiffs to set aside the jury’s verdict of $400 for plaintiff wife and $60 for plaintiff husband on the ground of inadequacy. The defendant’s doctor’s written report of his examination *914of the plaintiff wife conducted on October 2, 1963 (approximately 14 weeks after the occurrence of the incident), reflects the following-described injury: “ Local examination shows a fading pink and tan discoloration in the center of the anterior surface of her right thigh. This was more noticeable a month or so ago. It is fading. The scar itself is roughly ‘ L ’-shaped.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Connor v. PapertsianNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Kligman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Cohen v. City Canal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- McGlyn v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Resto v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manshul Construction Corp. v. Dormitory Authority of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1981