Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Colvin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 3, 2017No. 16 Civ. 292 (GWG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Carmen Valdez brings this action to review the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security finding that Valdez is not disabled and thus not eligible for Social Security benefits. The Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).1 Valdez has moved for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).2 The parties have consented to this matter being determined by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Talavera v. Comm’r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
  2. Pawlak v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
  3. Ritchie v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Wojtkowski v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API