Crary v. Jones & Dommersnas Co.

The apparent ground upon which the Superior' Court canceled the contract in controversy and restrained appellant from manufacturing saws thereunder is, that the latter made no report such as the contract provides for in response to the request made by appellee of date December 8, 1904. It is contended in ■behalf of appellant that appellee had waived a report under oath for the quarter preceding January 1, 1904.

In the written request referred to appellee said, “We desire a report showing what has been done under your contract with the company up to December 1, 1903.” In the contract appellant…