Winn v. Frasher
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*501JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a personal injury action. The trial court denied a motion for summary judgment of the defendants on the ground that the so-called “fireman’s rule” does not exist in this state. We disagree and reverse and remand.
I
THE UNUSUAL POSTURE OF THIS CASE AND OUR NARROW APPROACH IN THIS OPINION.
This appeal is before us in an unusual posture. The decision of the trial court that is on appeal is a denial of a motion for summary judgment. Ordinarily, this is not an appealable order. However, the trial court certified this case to us as an interlocutory appeal pursuant to I.A.R.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Christensen v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Fawcett v. IrbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Pincock v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Furstein v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carson v. HeadrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Aardema v. U.S. Dairy Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Bath Excavating & Construction Co. v. WillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.