Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Lattimore

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 8, 1954No. 11849Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStephens, Chief Judge

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court I conclude that Counts III and IV of the indictment are valid and that the decision of the District Court

dismissing those counts should therefore be reversed. I agree that Count VII is invalid and that the decision of the District Court dismissing that count should therefore be affirmed, but I reach this conclusion for reasons other than those expressed in the opinion of the court. Contrary to the decision of the court, I think that Count I is valid and that the decision of the District Court dismissing that count should therefore be reversed.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. United States v. RumelySupreme Court of the United States · 1953

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API