Carty v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALETA A TRAUGER, United States District Judge
Before the court are three motions for judgment on the administrative record. Two of the defendants, Eastman Chemical Company and the Eastman Chemical Company Welfare Benefit Program (collectively, “Eastman”), have filed a Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 38), to which plaintiff Gary Carty has filed a Response (Docket No. 49) and Eastman has filed a Reply (Docket No. 50). The third defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, in which…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Lloyd Marks v. Newcourt Credit Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mercer v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025