Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Cefaratti

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 14, 2000No. 99-3455PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Frank Cefaratti, who pleaded guilty to four counts arising from his execution of a scheme to defraud the United States Department of Education (DOE) out of student financial assistance funds, now appeals, arguing that the District Court erred in accepting his plea to the count charging him with engaging in monetary transactions in the proceeds of specified unlawful activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. He also challenges his sentence of 51 months imprisonment.

I

BACKGROUND

A

Procedural History

On September 8, 1998, a grand jury returned a 27-count…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. Robert Maher, AKA "Bob M.", Peter Mancusi, Andrew GiordanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Robert L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Wayne Morris MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. LessnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Gandia-MaysonetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Walter Kevin ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API