Legal Opinion

K.L. v. M.H.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2010No. 41A01-1003-JP-145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

For nearly five years, the parents of CH. have been unable to communicate and agree on custody and parenting time issues. Thus, the trial court appointed a parenting coordinator to assist in those matters. Moreover, the trial court deviated from the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines (Guidelines) to give Father additional parenting time with C.H.

Appellant-petitioner KL. (Mother) appeals the trial court's order regarding the parenting time schedule that existed between her and appellee-respondent M.H. (Father) as to their daughter, C.H. In particular, Mother argues…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bacon v. BaconIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Paternity of CHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API