Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ratliff

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 1988No. Appeal, 2352 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Department of Transportation (DOT) appeals a Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court order sustaining William Ratliffs appeal of a three-month drivers license suspension. We reverse.

Ratliff was the owner and operator of a motor vehicle uninsured at the time of a collision. DOT suspended his drivers license pursuant to 75 Pa. C. S. §1785, which provides that if the owner does not “maintain financial responsibility on the motor vehicle at the time of the accident, the department shall suspend his operating privilege.” (Emphasis added.) The common pleas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waigand v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. VernaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Bureau of Traffic Safety v. CormasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. RileyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. SlackCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. HillCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. SlackCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API