United States v. Khanu
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Government’s [18] Notice of Intent to Offer Certain Evidence as Intrinsic to the Charged Crimes, Or, in the Alternative, as Admissible Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Specifically, the Government intends to offer evidence that Defendant Abdul Khanu used cash to pay contractors to make capital improvements at his nightclubs, that he paid his employees in cash without reporting these payments to the IRS prior to 2002, and that he has not paid employment and sales taxes to the District of Columbia.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Edward Adio BadruCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. LozaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. Lerma-PlataDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.