Legal Opinion

United States v. Khanu

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 16, 2009No. Criminal Action 09-087 (CKK)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Government’s [18] Notice of Intent to Offer Certain Evidence as Intrinsic to the Charged Crimes, Or, in the Alternative, as Admissible Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Specifically, the Government intends to offer evidence that Defendant Abdul Khanu used cash to pay contractors to make capital improvements at his nightclubs, that he paid his employees in cash without reporting these payments to the IRS prior to 2002, and that he has not paid employment and sales taxes to the District of Columbia.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Edward Adio BadruCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. LozaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. United States v. Lerma-PlataDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API