Neece v. A. A. A. Realty Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Calvert
The holding of the majority that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals must be reversed and that of the trial court affirmed because of ambiguity in the contract between the par*413ties gives this case a most peculiar turn. It will no doubt come as a complete surprise to the parties as well as to the courts below.
The presentation of the case in this Court on this occasion is the sixth time it has been before a court, and never before has it even been suggested that the contract was ambiguous. It was first presented to the trial court on motions by both parties for summary judgment. Those…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Woods v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Trust Co., Indp. Exctr. v. BauereisenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.