Legal Opinion

Michael Earl Dyer v. Intera Corporation Intera Company, Ltd. And Tennessee Venture, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1989No. 88-5098PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Michael Earl Dyer, appeals from the district court’s decision that his claims are barred by the principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The district court so ruled because a lower Tennessee state court had previously dismissed an essentially identical case filed by Dyer for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Tennessee appeals court affirmed the dismissal, and Dyer’s petition to the State Supreme Court was denied. Dyer contends that he has been unfairly denied an opportunity to amend his complaint and that any…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Steve Isaac v. William SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Geraldine G. Cannon v. Loyola University of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Prime Focus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Palmer v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Rainey Bros. Construction Co. v. Memphis & Shelby County Board of AdjustmentDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
  4. In Re HorkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1993
  5. Briggs v. Cincinnati Court Index NewspaperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API