Legal Opinion

Lizana v. Edward Motor Sales Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1932No. 29975PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

E. V. Lizana, the appellant, filed his suit in the county court of Harrison county, seeking to recover two hundred dollars paid on a. truck purchased by him from the Edward Motor Sales Company. At the time of the sale, the speedometer on the truck showed that it had been run only seven thousand five hundred miles. The testimony of the appellant was to the effect that the salesman of the Edward Motor Sales Company represented that it had not been run more than said amount, and that it was in good condition. The testimony of the salesman for the Edward Motor Sales Company was to the effect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nash Mississippi Valley Motor Co. v. ChildressMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Louis Cohn & Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Rimer v. DuganMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Oswald v. McGeheeMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Alexander v. MeekMississippi Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jones v. West Side Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Fortenberry v. HerringtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Martin v. GillMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API