Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Doughty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— Scire facias by Doughty against Elliott as the replevin-bail of Henderson and Baxly commenced before a justice of the peace. Pleas, 1. Nul tiel record;' 2. No execution; 3. No return of nulla bona. The Circuit Court gave judgment for the plaintiff.

The facts, as they appear from the scire facias and the proof, are, that a judgment was obtained by Doughty against David S. Henderson and Lemuel Baxly, by the name and description of Henderson and Baxly, before W. V. Pollock a justice of the peace, which was duly replevied by Elliott as bail for the defendants ; that at the expiration of the time…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doughty v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Castner & Hinckley v. SymondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API