Legal Opinion

Houser v. County of Volusia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 2009No. 5D08-926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We review this case to determine if the trial court abused its discretion when it dismissed this negligence action as a sanction for dilatory behavior by Appellant’s counsel, Appellant, or both. Although the record is replete with allegations of dilatory behavior, 1 because the trial court did not make the requisite findings of fact to support the dismissal, pursuant to Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993), we are constrained to reverse and remand for further consideration.

Appellant filed a negligence action against Appellee on November 9, 2004, concerning an incident that occurred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kozel v. OstendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Scallan v. MARRIOTT INTERN., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. BarkmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API