Legal Opinion

Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Archer

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 8, 1922No. 193Published

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

For reasons stated in our former opinion (279 F. 878), the conclusion was reached that the statute under which the tax in question was levied is constitutional. We suggested that, if any error intervened in the calculation of the tax, the plaintiff should endeavor to secure a correction of such error by the tax commission, and to that end the further consideration of the ease was continued pending the action of the commission on plaintiff’s application. In pursuance of our suggestion the plaintiff filed with the tax commission on February 27 an application for rehearing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hump Hairpin Manufacturing Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. D. E. Foote & Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Grand Island & Northern Wyoming Railroad v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. City of Charlestown v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API