Legal Opinion

People v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1931No. Docket No. 7664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

Appeal from a judgment against the surety on a bail bond. The bail bond was furnished in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles in a prosecution for a misdemeanor. The defendant failed to appear for trial and the bail bond was ordered forfeited.

Appellant contends that under section 1043 of the Penal Code the trial for a misdemeanor may be had in the absence of the defendant and hence the forfeiture was unwarranted. Since the taking of this appeal, however, it has been settled that Penal Code, section 1043, applies only to trials in the superior court and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AymarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. In re TiptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API