Legal Opinion

Warburton v. Phoenix Steel Corporation

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 6, 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiff, an employee of A. E. Warbur-ton and Sons, Inc. [Warburton], was injured while working at the steel plant of Phoenix Steel Corporation [Phoenix] at Claymont, Delaware. 1 Phoenix had contracted with E. W. Bliss Company [Bliss] to make certain improvements in the steel plant. Bliss, in turn, had contracted with Noble J. Dick, Inc. [Dick] to perform some of the work for which Phoenix and Bliss had contracted. Dick, in turn, had contracted with Warburton to perform work provided under the contract between Bliss and Dick. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Delaware Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. State v. Interstate Amiesite CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  3. McKeon v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Tull v. TurekSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Norkus v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Indiana State Highway Commission v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Riverbend Community, LLC v. Green Stone Engineering, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. Sweetman v. Strescon Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Fina, Inc. v. ArcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API