Slenderbolic Health Industries, Inc. v. Boridy
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
Defendants below appeal from an adverse judgment non obstante veredicto wherein plaintiff sought overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-16 (1965), §§ 217-19 (1975), as amended (Supp.1965-75), and (Supp.1977) [hereinafter referred to as “Act”].
Plaintiff filed this cause of action contending that he was an employee of defendants within the definition of 29 U.S.C.A. § 203(e)(1) (Supp.1965-75)1 and, therefore, was entitled to overtime compensation pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(1965), as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Harbin v. SealeTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Havard v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979