Legal Opinion

Cassese v. Lindsay

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frahcis T. Murphy, Jr., J.

Plaintiffs, patrolmen in the Police Department of the City of New York, have instituted a class action for a declaratory judgment, and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from implementing and enforcing General Order No. 14 issued by the Police Department, Office of the Commissioner. Pursuant to a stipulation entered into by the respective parties, the action for decision has been submitted upon a motion for summary judgment by the plaintiffs, and a cross motion for the identical relief by the defendants, John V. Lindsay, as Mayor of the City of New…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Balcom v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. People Ex Rel. Kresser v. . FitzsimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Bangor Savings Bank v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  4. People ex rel. Qua v. GaffneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Simons v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole Fisher Rogow, Inc. v. Carl Ally, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. City of Newark v. BenjaminNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Harrington v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Kiernan v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API