Legal Opinion

State v. Roosma

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 9, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wolber, C. C. J.

These actions are before me pursuant to a reference made by the Supreme Court to find the facts in this issue. State v. Goodfellow, 111 N. J. L. 604 (Comp. Stat., p. 1712, § 28-A). The proceeding is one on information in the nature of quo warranto, under the provisions of section 4 of the statute (Comp. Stat., p. 4212), to determine the title between rival claimants to membership in the offices of the board of adjustment of the city of Passaic.

The relators, five in number, assert that each of them individually is a duly appointed member of the board of adjustment of the city…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Malleables Co. v. Town of BloomfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Buohl v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tagliareni v. StilzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API