Legal Opinion
Finch v. Galligher
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At chambers. Actions by Lucius R. Finch against Charles Galligher, and by Henry T. Finch and Edward L. Finch against Charles Galligher and Frank C. Galligher. Defendant Charles Galligher moves to set aside the service of process on him on the ground that it was served on him while attending court within the state as a party, and as an attorney in his own behalf. The following affidavits were filed in support of the motion:
1Opinion of the Court
“Charles Galligher, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That deponent is the defendant Charles Galligher above named. That deponent is, and at the times hereinafter mentioned was,' a non-resident of- the state of New York, and resides, and at all of said times resided; at Cairo, in the state of Illinois. That on or about the 23d day of September, 1890, this deponent came from said Cairo, 111., the residence of this deponent, to the city of New York, for the purpose of attending as a party, and for the purpose of attending, and with the right to cross-examine witnesses upon, certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Greer v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marks v. La Societe Anonyme de l'Union des PapeteriesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- Kreiser v. ScofieldNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894