Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clarendon Place Corp. v. Landmark Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 23, 1992Published

1Dissent

Rosenberger, J. (dissenting).

I would modify the order by deeming the defendant Public Administrator’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 to be a motion for permissive joinder pursuant to CPLR 1002, and by granting the motion joining the Public Administrator as a party plaintiff, and would otherwise affirm.

The plaintiffs owned the premises in which 87 people were *11killed at the Happyland Social Club and instituted this action for a judgment declaring that the insurance company defendants were obligated to defend and indemnify them in connection with lawsuits arising from the fire. The insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re the Liquidation of Nassau InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Lloyd Capital Corp. v. BehrmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Valle v. BlackwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API