United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Adams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The issue in this case is whether the trial court properly denied the motion filed by appellant, United States Fidelity Guaranty Company (USF G), to intervene in a suit for damages sustained by appellees, Allen and Edith Adams, in their purchase of a house. We affirm.
The facts of this case are as follows:
On January 13, 1984, Allen and Edith Adams filed suit against Alabama Elk River Development Agency (Elk River), alleging that they suffered damages as a result of various defects in construction in the house they bought from Elk River. Elk River subsequently filed a third-party complaint…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Crown Financial Corporation v. Winthrop Lawrence Corporation and Lammot Dupont Copeland, Jr., and Diversified General, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Thrasher v. BartlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
3Cited by16 opinions
- Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. DingwellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. EAST CENT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- ALABAMA FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.