Lee v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Harold R. Banke.
Tydeous Lee a/k/a Tydeous Booker was convicted of the sale of cocaine. On appeal, Lee enumerates three errors all of which challenge the trial court’s evidentiary rulings.
On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Rigenstrup v. State, 197 Ga. App. 176, 181 (4) (398 SE2d 25) (1990). Viewed in that light, the State’s evidence was as follows. A videotape depicted Lee’s hand-to-hand sale of a substance to Detective Jane Kenny. In exchange for $20, the undercover officer received a pinkish, red-colored ziplock bag directly from Lee.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Rigenstrup v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Durham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Nealy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998