Rome v. Sinai Hospital of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, P.J.
We adopt the facts as they are clearly and concisely set forth in the dissenting opinion.
For the reasons stated in Brown v Siang, 107 Mich App 91; 309 NW2d 575 (1981), we hold that plaintiff’s due process right to a fair hearing before an impartial tribunal is not violated by MCL 600.5040 et seq.; MSA 27A.5040 et seq., where one of the three arbitrators assigned to hear a medical malpractice claim is a physician. Nor is the act unconscionable in that it abrogates plaintiff’s constitutional right of access to the courts. Thus, we affirm the trial court’s decision upholding the statute.
However,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. SiangMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SokolowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. ReckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Capman v. Harper-Grace HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kukowski v. PiskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McKinstry v. Valley Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinic, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Horn v. CookeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gale v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Northern Acres, Inc. v. Hillman State Bank (In Re Northern Acres, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- Ewald v. Pontiac General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.