Legal Opinion

Dieudonne v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 5, 2013No. AC 33616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The respondent, the commissioner of correction, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting in part an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Fritzgerald Dieudonne. The respondent claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that the ineffective assistance of the petitioner’s trial counsel prejudiced the petitioner in accordance with the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984). We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

In the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Floyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spearman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Dupigney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Wright v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Dieudonne v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  5. Wright v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API