Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. McKinnon Ford Sales

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1974No. 7395PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

This action to recover damages for the negligent repair of a truck was commenced in Washoe County by Mike Flournoy. The defendant McKinnon Ford Sales, a domestic corporation, timely filed a demand and motion to change venue to Pershing County, the only county in Nevada where it does business. The defendant’s articles of incorporation designated an address in Reno, Washoe County, Nevada, as its principal office or place of business, and the certificate of the resident agent in charge of its principal office also specified an address in Washoe County.1 The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stocks v. StocksNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Willamette National Lumber Co. v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Higgins v. Hampshire Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Fabbi v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paul Heuring Motors, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1993
  2. Daniel P. Taber v. Exemplar Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  3. Daniel P. Taber v. Exemplar Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  4. Liberty Mut. v. ThomassonNevada Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API