Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Chrysler Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 23, 1996No. 1—94—3836, 1—94—3886 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a jury verdict of $175,000 was returned in favor of the plaintiff, Dennis M. Hamilton, and against the defendant, Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler), for a violation of the Illinois Motor Vehicle Franchise Act (MVFA) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 1211/2, par. 751 et seq. (now 815 ILCS 710/1 et seq. (West 1994))), the circuit court entered judgment on the verdict and, thereafter, awarded the plaintiff an additional $125,000 for attorney fees. Chrysler appeals, contending that: (1) the plaintiff’s action was not brought within the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lowrey v. MalkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Demchuk v. DuplancichIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Feen v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gibbs v. Crane Elevator Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Gonzalez v. Thorek Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Guiffrida v. Boothy's Palace Tavern, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Guiffrida v. Boothy's Palace Tavern, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API