Harris v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Michael Rodney Harris appeals his convictions for the aggravated assault of Carla Passley and Monica Passley, contending that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, (2) a fatal variance exists between the allegations set forth in the indictment and the evidence adduced at trial, and (3) the trial court erred by admitting cumulative evidence. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
“On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and [Harris] no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Burgan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Lowery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Fussell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blow v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Cherry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Petro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.