Legal Opinion

Nunley v. Shell Oil Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 20, 1956No. 42197PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

Writs were granted in this case limited to the question of whether or not the *351plaintiff was entitled to attorney’s fees under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 30 :102.

The plaintiff brought suit seeking the partial concellation of an oil and gas lease on the ground of non-development and for attorney’s fees. The lease in question covered 84 acres of land. Forty-four acres of this land, was included in a 640 acre drilling unit established by the Department of Conservation. The plaintiff-lessor is seeking in this suit to have the lease cancelled on the remaining forty acres of land,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wier v. GrubbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Wilcox v. Shell Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. Eota Realty Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Romero. Romero v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Melancon v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Bailey v. MeadowsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Clovis v. Pacific Northwest Pipeline CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Cutrer v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API