Legal Opinion

Espalla v. Lyon Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1933No. 1 Div. 728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The cause was tried on plaintiffs’ part upon count 9 as amended (appearing in the report of the case), which was fashioned after the complaint in Charles R. Byrd & Co. v. Age-Herald Pub. Co., 219 Ala. 505, 122 So. 831, and which seeks damages within the contemplation of the parties in the amount of plaintiffs’ commission as a broker arising from the breach of the special contract therein set out.

At the conclusion of the evidence, there was a directed verdict for the defendant, and the action of the court in giving such charge presents the question of first importance on this…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gerding v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Hayden v. GrilloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Sayre v. Wilson & IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Hover v. Whittaker-Warren AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. ALA. FUEL SALES CO. v. Vulcan Energy ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Ellis v. MorganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Sorivi v. BaldiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API