Legal Opinion

Margarum v. Margarum

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Grey, V. C.

The bill is filed by a wife, alleging abandonment and nonsupport by the defendant husband.

In order to vest this court with jurisdiction it must be shown, first, that the husband abandoned or separated himself from the wife, and secondly, that he refused or neglected to support her.

Both of these conditions must exist under section 20 of the Divorce act (which alone vests this court with jurisdiction in cases of this character) to justify an application to compel the husband to pay an allowance for the support of the wife.

The condition of abandonment must necessarily be the husband’s…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Biddle v. BiddleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Mattox v. MattoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API