Legal Opinion
State v. Hamilton
Volusia County Court
Decided September 24, 1983No. Case No. 13138/9-KM; Case No. 08278-LD; Case No. 42084/5-KU; Case No. 43197/8-KU; Case No. 42203/4-KU; Case No. 43531 /2-KU; Case No. 42236/7-KU; Case No. 335-191/2/3/4-QPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GAYLE GRAZIANO, County Judge.
This matter having come before the Court on various defense motions to suppress, which were consolidated, in the interest of judicial economy, solely for the determination of the issue raised in said motions, and the court having considered the evidence presented, arguments of counsel, the legal precedents throughout the State and Nation and being more fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motions to Suppress the breathalyzer results are hereby denied for the reasons more fully set forth below.
(“Breathalyzer”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Bobby J. HerndonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- State v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- State v. PhillipeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981