Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1996No. A96A0755PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Clemmie Daniels sued the Georgia Department of Transportation (“DOT”) for injuries he sustained in an automobile collision at a state highway intersection. Daniels alleged that the DOT’s negligent design of the intersection and its failure to upgrade the intersection to eliminate safety hazards caused the collision. The trial court granted the DOT’s motion for summary judgment, and Daniels appeals that order. For reasons which follow, we affirm.

“The applicable summary judgment standard is that of Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474). A movant/defendant must…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Department of Transportation v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Exum v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Papera v. TOC Retail, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Lynch v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Murray v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Department of Transportation v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Sadler v. Department of Transportation of StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API