Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Willey v. Mayer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 20, 1994No. 93SC452Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Lohr

The majority concludes that the Colorado Court of Appeals erred in determining that an agent’s signature purporting to be that of his principal was “unauthorized” under section 4-3-404(1), 2 C.R.S. (1992). Maj. op. at 1263, 1266. It therefore reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and remands the *1267case to that court for further proceedings. Maj. op. at 1266. Although I agree that the court of appeals erred, I conclude that it erred only by applying an incorrect test to determine whether a principal is precluded by negligence from defending against liability to a holder in due course. I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gast v. American Cas. Co. of Reading Pa.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Brereton v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. J. GORDON NEELY ETC., INC. v. American Nat. Bank of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Willey v. MayerColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API