Legal Opinion

Bolton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1963No. 40124PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of cruelty to an animal. His amended motion for new trial was denied and he excepted to that judgment. Held:

1. The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the finding that the defendant wilfully and without justification shot and killed a dog, the property of Yirge Lovell, Sr., as charged in the accusation; and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. May v. State, 120 Ga. 497 (2) (48 SE 153); Moore v. State, 121 Ga. 194 (48 SE 919).

2. “In the absence of a proper and pertinent written request for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Richards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. May v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Rushin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API