Legal Opinion

Matter of Holt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1981No. 8112DC290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

The involuntary commitment statute, G.S. 122-58.7(i), required as a condition to a valid commitment order that the district court find, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, two distinct facts: first, that respondent was mentally ill or inebriate, as those words are defined in G.S. 122-36; and second, that respondent was dangerous to herself or others. In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E. 2d 409 (1975).

The court found, in its oral ruling and its written order, that respondent was mentally ill. The record contains competent evidence, medical and non-medical, to support…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Matter of UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Matter of PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Matter of MedlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API