Matter of Holt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
The involuntary commitment statute, G.S. 122-58.7(i), required as a condition to a valid commitment order that the district court find, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, two distinct facts: first, that respondent was mentally ill or inebriate, as those words are defined in G.S. 122-36; and second, that respondent was dangerous to herself or others. In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E. 2d 409 (1975).
The court found, in its oral ruling and its written order, that respondent was mentally ill. The record contains competent evidence, medical and non-medical, to support…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Matter of UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Matter of PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Matter of MedlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982