Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Bacon

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCurn, J.

This is an application for a mandamus directed to the commissioner of public works of the city of Rome, N. Y., to restore William Mahan, the petitioner, to the position of caretaker of the Stokes reservoir. The petitioner in June of 1919 tried and passed a civil service examination conducted by the municipal civil service commission of the city of Rome for the position known as “ caretaker of Stokes Reservoir.” In July, 1919, the petitioner was appointed from the eligible civil service list and his appointment has been continued under successive administrations until February 13, 1934, when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. ParisNew York Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahan v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Huber v. StephanNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API