Legal Opinion

Thomas v. National Football League Players Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 19, 1997No. Nos. 96-7242, 96-7243PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

A principal claim in this case is that the defendant, acting pursuant to “mixed motives,” unlawfully retaliated against the plaintiffs in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1994). The issues on appeal require us to delimit the requirements of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981), and Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Fye v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Webb v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Fernandes v. Costa Bros. MasonryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API