Legal Opinion
In re Bradhurst Urban Renewal Area
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fourth separate and partial final decree, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered July 15, 2005, which ordered condemnor City of New York to compensate claimant in the principal amount of $1,395,000 plus interest for taking real property, unanimously modified, on the facts, the principal award reduced to $1,096,520, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The court exercised its discretion in a provident manner by determining that the highest and best use of the subject property was the manner in which it was being used at the time of the taking (see Matter of Adirondack…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of City of New York (Rockaway Beach)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the Adirondack Hydro Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- General Crushed Stone Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Maspeth 5718 Associates, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- City of Binghamton v. Aleo RosefskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of Mill Creek Phase 1 Staten Island Bluebelt SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title in Fee Simple for the New Creek Bluebelt, Phase 3New York Supreme Court · 2009