Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Watson v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 2, 1936No. 14324Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabeer

(concurring):

The Court is in unanimous agreement that the judgment against the defendant, W. P. Kennedy, doing business as Piggty Wiggly Grocery Company, should be affirmed; but a majority think that the judgment as to the defendant, Meece, should be reversed. It seems to me, however, that the liability of Meece, under the facts of this case, rests, and the judgment against him should be affirmed, on the ground of the negligence of his driver, John Young, in permitting John Kennedy, a volunteer, to assist in the performance of the work intrusted to Young; the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Kayser v. Van NestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Hollidge v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Thixton v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API