Legal Opinion

Foster v. Gilster Mary Lee Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 2011No. CA 11-355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUG MARTIN, Judge.

Appellant Sandra Foster appeals from that portion of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s opinion finding her entitled to a 30% wage-loss disability. Appellee Gilster Mary Lee Corp. (“Gilster”) cross-appeals from the part of the Commission’s decision finding that Gil-ster did not make a bona fide offer of employment to Foster. We find no error and affirm on both direct and cross-appeal.

Foster attended school only through the fifth grade and worked at manual-labor jobs most of her life. She began working for Gilster in 2002 and sustained an admittedly compensable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glass v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Frances v. Gaylord Container Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Emerson Elec. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Jordan v. Home Depot Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API