Legal Opinion
Parrella v. Silk City Auto Mall, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 25, 2024No. 4:22-cv-40140Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) DEREK PARRELLA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 22-40140-FDS SILK CITY AUTO MALL, INC, and ) LUCKY 13 RECOVERY, INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT SAYLOR, C.J. Plaintiff Derek Parrella has moved for default judgment as to defendant Silk City Auto Mall, Inc. A default was entered against Silk City under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) on April 27, 2023. Although this action was brought against multiple defendants, only Silk City has been defaulted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) states that: “When an action presents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Gonzalez Figueroa v. JC PENNEY PUERTO RICOCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Nystedt v. NigroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Walden v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.