Legal Opinion

Citrus County v. Halls River Development, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 20, 2009No. 5D08-975PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrfinger, J.

Citrus County appeals a non-final order determining that it had “inordinately burdened” real property owned by Halls River Development Inc., as that term is used in the Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act, section 70.001, Florida Statutes (2005). The County contends that the trial court erred in finding that Ordinance 2002-A-10 (“the Ordinance”) inordinately burdened Halls River’s use of its real property; that Halls River had a reasonable, investment-backed expectation to develop its property as a multifamily condominium; or that the Ordinance burdened Halls River’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. MacHado v. MusgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Golf Channel v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Martin County v. EdenfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Klepper v. BreslinSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nassau County v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. M & H PROFIT, INC. v. City of Panama CityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Jacksonville Property Rights Ass'n v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Wendler v. City of St. AugustineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Town of Ponce Inlet v. Pacetta, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API